Skip to content

Electronics

Components

News

Understanding SiC MOSFET Power Modules and Ensuring its Short-Circuit Safety

by Yangzhuozhang 01 Jun 2024
Although silicon has long been the dominant semiconductor choice for power electronic devices, emerging limitations in terms of power losses, size constraints, and maximum allowable junction temperature have shown the need for Wide-Bandgap semiconductors (WBG) and its research. Among these, Silicon Carbide (SiC) stands out for its combination of high frequency switching capability and performance at high temperatures. Despite its advantages, recent research has shown the challenges SiC devices face, particularly in short-circuit conditions, where its performance falls short compared to traditional silicon devices.

To enhance SiC power device reliability, understanding failure mechanisms under short-circuit conditions is crucial. While SiC theoretically offers higher thermal limits due to its wider band gap, practical constraints such as higher current density and smaller chip area impose limitations on its short-circuit withstanding capability. To address this, a new safety criteria based on short-circuit current and gate voltage have been proposed, offering a practical and cost-effective approach to defining Short-Circuit Safe Operation Areas (SCSOA) for SiC devices, crucial for ensuring their reliability in diverse operating conditions.

 

 

Requirements Needed in the Implementation of the Experiment

 

Two commercial SiC MOSFET power modules, Cree’s 1.2 kV/300 A and Rohm’s 1.2 kV/180 A, underwent a non-destructive testing (NDT) investigation at Aalborg University, Denmark. As shown in Figure 1, the NDT setup involved a high-voltage power supply charging a capacitor bank for testing up to 10 kA and 2.4 kV without device destruction. The system included protection switches, a computer-designed busbar for current distribution, and a 100 MHz FPGA for signal control and measurement acquisition. A PC facilitated data acquisition and remote control, linked to an oscilloscope and FPGA board. Cree's recommended gate driver, CGD15HB62P, was used with desaturation protection disabled. Experiments were conducted with gate-emitter voltages of +20 V/-6 V and a 5 Ω external gate resistance, ensuring proper controllability at a case temperature of approximately 25°C.

 

image.png

Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the non-destructive testing model.

 

On the other hand, for the software section, an automated tool with a user-friendly GUI in MATLAB helped in the short circuit testing, ensuring maximum consistency. Users input test parameters, including test quantity and pulse interval. The GUI then passes the conditions and initiates tests, communicating the sequence to the FPGA. A 30-second off-time permits device cooling between tests. Data checks prevent fatal errors during communication and a local echo displays parameters sent to the FPGA for user reference. Following each test, waveforms are acquired through Active-X functions from the oscilloscope, capturing test index and time-stamp data for storage. This system facilitates repetitive testing, providing a reliable method for assessing device performance while offering ease of use through its intuitive interface.

 

 

Results Obtained

 

A. 1.2 kV/ 300 A SiC MOSFET: Figure 2 depicts a short-circuit event where a 1.2 kV/300 A SiC MOSFET fails in 3.2 μs at 600 V bias and 25°C. The device survived up to 3.1 μs but failed due to thermal runaway in the subsequent pulse. Initially, the drain current surged to 5 kA, then decreased, suggesting an internal temperature rise. Delayed failure occurred after 2 μs due to a burn-out chip and short circuit. Thermal runaway was attributed to a high off-state leakage current activating a parasitic BJT. Another failure mechanism observed involved a gate-source short circuit caused by local overheating, exacerbated by gate oxide issues. Higher voltages and temperatures intensified gate leakage. Addressing these concerns is crucial for SiC MOSFET reliability.

 

image.png

Figure 2: SiC MOSFET fails in 3.2 μs at 600 V bias and 25°C.

 

 

 

B.  1.2 kV/ 180 A SiC MOSFET: Short circuit tests were conducted on a 1.2 kV/180 A SiC MOSFET from Rohm, resulting in failure within 7.2 μs at VDC = 800 V. A thermal runaway failure occurred after 7 μs despite the device initially turning off the short circuit current. Burn-out of one MOSFET chip was observed, with a progressively increasing current tail indicating high drain leakage. The calculated critical energy for the 1.2 kV/180 A device was 8.2 J. Compared to a 1.2 kV/300 A device, the 1.2 kV/180 A module exhibited higher robustness against short circuits due to its lower drain saturation current, resulting in better temperature stress handling. Critical short circuit energies were 6.9 J for the 1.2 kV/300 A device and 8.2 J for the 1.2 kV/180 A device, indicating the latter's superior capability to withstand higher temperature stress.

 

 

 

The Proposed System Based on Short-Circuit Criterion

 

The technique proposed shows a method to characterize the Short-Circuit Safe Operation Area (SCSOA) of SiC MOSFETs by monitoring short-circuit current and gate-source voltage. This method involves setting limits for these parameters based on two safety criteria. Experimental results show positive results in predicting short-circuit failures. The algorithm involves setting limits for short-circuit current (ID,SOA) and gate-source voltage (VG,SOA), then conducting tests with increasing short-circuit pulse lengths. After each test, acquired waveforms are analyzed, and if limits are violated, the data is stored for SCSOA determination. If limits aren't met, the experiment continues with longer pulse lengths. This approach requires a pass/fail evaluation after each test, helping to prevent short-circuit failures in SiC MOSFETs.

 

image.png

Figure 3: 1.2 kV/ 180 A SiC MOSFET where the short circuit current limit is 1.5 kA.

 

The proposed system uses the negative relationship between short circuit current and junction temperature. By defining a maximum allowable junction temperature during short circuit events, a safe drain current level can be determined. Tests demonstrate the effectiveness of this method across various DC-link voltages, ensuring safe operation without exceeding predefined current limits. The strategy involves limiting the short circuit pulse duration to prevent thermal runaway and gate drivers must react swiftly, especially at higher DC-link voltages. Figure 3 shows the effectiveness of the short circuit when the system was tested.

 

Conclusion

 

An experiment was conducted to investigate the short-circuit withstand capability (SCSOA) of commercial 1.2 kV SiC MOSFET power modules. Through the examination of their characteristics, this study aimed to understand their potentials and limitations, ultimately drawing initial conclusions on optimal operational practices to ensure robust SCSOA.

 

Two failure mechanisms were identified, consistent with those documented in the literature for discrete SiC MOSFETs. In response, a new technique was proposed to delineate the SCSOA of the two studied SiC MOSFET power modules, incorporating two short-circuit safety criteria. This guideline serves to provide a safety margin, mitigating unnecessary failures during typical SCSOA characterization. These findings contribute to enhancing the reliability and operational efficiency of SiC MOSFET power modules in various applications.

930 x 520px

SPRING SUMMER LOOKBOOK

Sample Block Quote

Praesent vestibulum congue tellus at fringilla. Curabitur vitae semper sem, eu convallis est. Cras felis nunc commodo eu convallis vitae interdum non nisl. Maecenas ac est sit amet augue pharetra convallis.

Sample Paragraph Text

Praesent vestibulum congue tellus at fringilla. Curabitur vitae semper sem, eu convallis est. Cras felis nunc commodo eu convallis vitae interdum non nisl. Maecenas ac est sit amet augue pharetra convallis nec danos dui. Cras suscipit quam et turpis eleifend vitae malesuada magna congue. Damus id ullamcorper neque. Sed vitae mi a mi pretium aliquet ac sed elitos. Pellentesque nulla eros accumsan quis justo at tincidunt lobortis deli denimes, suspendisse vestibulum lectus in lectus volutpate.
Prev Post
Next Post

Thanks for subscribing!

This email has been registered!

Shop the look

Choose Options

Recently Viewed

Edit Option
Terms & Conditions
What is Lorem Ipsum? Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum. Why do we use it? It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout. The point of using Lorem Ipsum is that it has a more-or-less normal distribution of letters, as opposed to using 'Content here, content here', making it look like readable English. Many desktop publishing packages and web page editors now use Lorem Ipsum as their default model text, and a search for 'lorem ipsum' will uncover many web sites still in their infancy. Various versions have evolved over the years, sometimes by accident, sometimes on purpose (injected humour and the like).
this is just a warning
Login
Shopping Cart
0 items
0%